How to handle data synchronization conflicts with AJAX in JavaScript applications

In JavaScript applications that use AJAX, data synchronization conflicts can occur when multiple users make concurrent updates to the same data. These conflicts need to be handled gracefully to ensure data integrity and prevent loss of important information. In this article, we will explore some strategies for handling data synchronization conflicts in JavaScript applications.

1. Optimistic Concurrency Control

One approach to handling data synchronization conflicts is optimistic concurrency control. This strategy assumes that conflicts are rare and allows multiple users to independently make changes to the same data. When a user wants to update a piece of data, the current version is fetched from the server. The user’s changes are applied locally, and when they attempt to save the changes, the server checks if the current version on the server matches the version the user fetched.

If the versions match, the user’s changes are saved. However, if the versions do not match, it means that another user has made changes since the fetch operation. In this case, an error is returned, and the user is notified of the conflict. The user can then choose to discard their changes, merge them with the updated version, or take some other action.

The implementation of optimistic concurrency control typically involves tracking the version number of the data on the client and server side. This version number can be included in the AJAX request and validated on the server to detect conflicts.

Example code:

const fetchData = () => {
  // Fetch the current version of the data from the server
};

const saveChanges = (data, version) => {
  // Apply the changes to the data locally
  
  // Send the changes to the server along with the version number
  // Server checks if the version on the server matches the version sent by the client
  
  // If versions match, save the changes
  // If versions do not match, handle the conflict
};

2. Pessimistic Concurrency Control

Another approach to handling data synchronization conflicts is pessimistic concurrency control. This strategy assumes that conflicts are more likely to occur and aims to prevent them by locking the data when a user begins editing it. This means that other users cannot make changes to the data until the lock is released.

In a JavaScript application, when a user wants to edit a piece of data, an AJAX request is made to acquire a lock on the data. If the lock is successfully obtained, the user can make changes and save them without worrying about conflicts. Once the changes are saved, the lock is released, and other users can acquire the lock and make their own changes.

If another user attempts to acquire the lock while it is held by someone else, they are notified that the data is being edited and may need to wait or be directed to a conflict resolution interface.

Pessimistic concurrency control can be implemented by adding a lock field to the data model and using AJAX requests to acquire and release the lock.

Example code:

const acquireLock = () => {
  // Send an AJAX request to acquire a lock on the data
};

const releaseLock = () => {
  // Send an AJAX request to release the lock on the data
};

const saveChanges = (data) => {
  // Apply the changes to the data locally
  
  // Send the changes to the server and save them
};

#data #synchronization